Quantitative measurements - the big problem (for me anyway)

Since I started doing Bengston I was never certain if a particular number of treatments, a certain length or quality of my mind set was sufficient. When it came to hands-on it was relatively easy to gauge because I could see the effect (for the most part) in a relatively short time. Sometimes immediately when it was pain relief. But when it came to water or cotton treatment all bets where off. 

Then quite recently I heard Bill in a YT video mention that he tried to "treat" simple beer yeast in treated and untreated sugar water and measured the CO2 output under controlled conditions. This is a simple enough setup to get it done in my "garage"  (I think) and for proof of concept I have purchased

• powdered sugar 
• dry yeast
• a precise electronic scale
• a precise (I hope) digital thermometer
• some new glas jars (with metal screw cap I wont use)
• some throw-away lab gloves made from latex

I use the same expensive mineral water (none carbonated) treated and untreated. The water, sugar, yeast mix is thrown into the jar, briefly tumbled for mixing, then the glove is pulled over the open top (hopefully air tight). The control is treated the same way by a person not knowing or practising Bengston. I will have to place them close to each other because of place restrains and the slow filling of the gloves up to full upright position is recorded by my travel cam with timestamp.

If there is a significant timewise difference between the two probes it will serve as proof that a more sophisticated setup could in principle be used to measure effectiveness of treatment.  

Comments are welcome, please do not hold back, even if you  think this is a stupid idea. But it would help if you had a reason for your judgement too 😉